Blog

Home / Blog / Single Post

Discussion: Nurses Make the Difference Essay

Discussion: Nurses Make the Difference Essay

Post a 2-paragraph response (of at least 350 words) to either Option 1 or Option 2.
Use the writing resources, writing samples, and Discussion Rubric to develop your post. Reflect on your reading from this week, and then address one of the following:
Option 1
Provide an overview of a Magnet facility. Include an explanation of how Magnet status drives health care change in the institution. Develop and post cohesive paragraphs and use evidence to support your ideas. The practice of writing cohesive paragraphs is essential to good writing. Focus each paragraph on one main idea or goal.
OR
Option 2
Describe the personal contribution a nurse might make in the process of seeking or maintaining Magnet designation. Develop and post cohesive paragraphs and use evidence to support your ideas. The practice of writing cohesive paragraphs is essential to good writing. Focus each paragraph on one main idea or goal.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nurses make the difference
Name
Institution
 
 
Nurses make the difference
Option 2
Magnet designation is an award that is accredited to medical facilities under the authority of the American Nurses Credentialing Center. The designation refers to medical facilities that are acknowledged for recognizing and promoting structures of higher operational standards that seek to improve personnel empowerment, retention and job pleasure. In fact, medical facilities with a Magnet designation must offer evidence of having met the set thresholds of professionalism and quality with regards to nursing services provision (American Nurses Credentialing Center, 2018).
Nursing personnel can make meaningful contributions towards achieving and maintaining Magnet designation. This occurs through the nurse ensuring that he or she has access to opportunities, resources and information that would improve the effectiveness and efficiency in completing professional tasks. To be more precise, the nurse should operate at a higher standard of respect, professional independence and assigning worth to the nursing profession while enhancing communication with other stakeholders (Friese et al., 2015).
In addition, the nurse can make a contribution through professional autonomy and independence. Through having greater control of nursing practice that goes beyond routine decision-making, the nurse gains the capacity to engaged in policy making and design as well as setting up internal nursing management frameworks. This creates opportunities for self-growth and allows the nurse to achieve a higher operational standard (Stimpfel, Rosen & McHugh, 2014).
Besides that, the nurse can contribute by creating and maintaining communication platforms that ensure the right stakeholder is at the right plan at the right time to either pass on or receive information. This improves communication effectiveness so that nurses are given a voice in determining excellence within the facility as well as adding value to the facility. Through this contribution, nursing personnel would feel more respective and appreciated since they are allowed to offer views vital to improve care outcomes (Stimpfel, Rosen & McHugh, 2014).
Also, the nurse can contribute through embracing evidence-based practice. This entails using the latest and best available evidence to support care decisions. Through this contribution, the facility would experience reduced operational costs and improved care quality and outcomes. This is based on the awareness that nursing practice can play an important role in meeting the Magnet objective of quality care through integrating evidence into practice (Wilson et al., 2015).
Yet another contribution can occur through shared governance. This presents adaptive and flexible structures ensures that nursing personnel are included in decision-making processes. This allows them to contribute to dispute resolution, setting objectives and goals, controlling the nursing profession, participating in governance activities, ensuring accountability, and controlling resource access and use. Moreover, shared governance allows the nursing personnel to conduct more comprehensive self-appraisals that identify professional practice areas that require improvements for the best care outcomes (Lamoureux et al., 2014).
It is important to note that the American Nurses Credentialing Center acknowledges and designates Magnet medical facilities on the nurses’ contributions through their experiences and quality of care provided since excelling nursing services are linked with favorable outcomes for patients and other stakeholders. The Center particular looks at good nursing performance as an important aspect when credentialing. That is because performance has a direct correlation with outcomes as an intentional incident. This is based on the awareness that good performance will typically be accompanied by favorable outcomes while bad performance will typically be accompanied by unfavorable outcomes. Additionally, nursing personnel contribute through attaining new knowledge, innovations, leadership, and structural empowerment that are reflected in care outcomes (Wilson et al., 2015). In this respect, nurses can make personal contributions in the process of seeking or maintain Magnet designation.
 
 
References
American Nurses Credentialing Center (2018). ANCC Magnet Recognition Program. Retrieved from http://www.nurse credentialing.org/Magnet
Friese, C. R., Xia, R., Ghaferi, A., Birkmeyer, J. D., & Banerjee, M. (2015). Hospitals in ‘magnet’ program show better patient outcomes on mortality measures compared to non-‘magnet’ hospitals. Health Affairs, 34(6), 986-992, 1-12.
Lamoureux, J., Judkins-Cohn, T., Butao, R., McCue, V., & Garcia, F. (2014). Measuring perceptions of shared governance in clinical practice: psychometric testing of the RN-focused Index of Professional Governance (IPNG). Journal of Research in Nursing, 19(1), 69-87.
Stimpfel, A. W., Rosen, J. E., & McHugh, M. D. (2014). Understanding the role of the professional practice environment on quality of care in magnet® and non-magnet hospitals. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 44(1), 10-16. doi:10.1097/NNA.0000000000000015
Wilson, M., Sleutel, M., Newcomb, P., Behan, D., Walsh, J. & Baldwin, K. (2015). Empowering nurses with evidence-based practice environments: Surveying Magnet, pathway to excellence, and non-magnet facilities in one healthcare system. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 12(1), 12–21.

Tips and Tricks from our Blog